Groups

Group

A group is a set together with a composition law such that the following properties hold:

  • Associativity: for all .
  • Identity: there exists such that for all .
  • Inverse: for every there exists such that .

We may sometime denote the group by to emphasize the law of composition.

Remark

Whilst the definition of associativity involves only three elements it implies the generalized associative law, that is, a product of elements in a group has the same value regardless of any parentheses.

Proposition

Let be a group. Then

  1. For any , the inverse is unique and denoted .
  2. For any , .
  3. .
  4. In the cancellation laws holds: for , implies that .

Subgroups and Order

Abelian Group

A group is called abelian if the composition law is commutative.

Finite Group

A group is called finite if is a finite set; otherwise the group is called infinite. The order of a finite group is the number of elements in a finite group, denoted .

Power & Order of an Element

For an element and in a group and we write for the unambiguous composition of with itself times (this follows from generalized associativity). We also define and . An element has finite order if there is such that ; the minimal such is the order of and denoted . Otherwise we say that has infinite order.

Laws of Exponents

Let be a group, let , and let and be integers. Then

  1. If and commute, then .
  2. .
  3. .

Subgroup

Let be a group, a nonempty subset is called a subgroup of if it is a group under the same law of composition of . In such case we write .

Theorem

A nonempty subset is a subgroup if and only if it is closed under composition and under taking inverses. That is and . The latter two can be consolidated to .

e.g. All subgroups of are of the form for some . This is easy to see since if is a nontrivial subgroup, then it contains some non-zero integer . If we can replace it by . Let be the smallest positive integer in , then any element in must be a multiple of , otherwise the division algorithm gives with , hence , contradicting the minimality of . Thus, .